In his biography, Mirror to the Blind, Abdul Sattar Edhi complains how he detests being called a ‘maulana’.

‘Mine was never a religious beard,’ he says. ‘It was always a revolutionary beard,’ he explains – perhaps inspired by Karl Marx, whom Edhi identifies as an inspiration during his youth. In the book he is quoted as saying that hardly any man in Pakistan used to have a beard in the 1950s.

A senior journalist, Ghulam Farooq, agrees: ‘In the 1950s and 1960s, no self-respecting Pakistani from any class would have liked to be seen with a long beard, apart from the mullahs. All this stuff about the beard having any religious significance played absolutely no role in the lives of Pakistanis. In fact, the beard was seen as a symbol of exploitation and bigotry.’

Showing me black and white photos of political rallies of the late 1960s, a former progressive student leader, Naushad Hussain, enthusiastically challenged me to point out ten men with beards among the hundreds that stood listening to Zulfikar Ali Bhutto and Asghar Khan in the photos. I couldn’t.

‘Look closely,’ he smiled. ‘There are only three.’
‘What about the ‘revolutionary beards’?’ I asked.

‘Revolutionary beards became famous in the West after Castro and Che Guevara’s revolution in Cuba,’ Naushad explained. ‘But long hair and revolutionary beards (in Pakistan) really became popular from 1970 onwards.’

A. Kabir, another progressive student leader (at the Karachi University in 1973-74), suggests that very few male students had beards even in the 1970s. ‘Ironically, only the most radical Marxists on campus went around with beards, looking like Che. Even the staunchest members of the right-wing Islami Jamiat Taleba (IJT), were clean-shaven. Being young and having a beard (and long hair) in those days meant that one was a radical leftist.’

Beards, especially heavy stubbles, also became popular as an expression of one having a creative and artistic disposition. Mahboobullah, a former graduate of the famous the NCA, Lahore, remembers that (in the 1970s), coffee houses and college canteens were full of long-haired and bearded young men sipping tea and beer, chain smoking and discussing politics, philosophy and art. ‘A young man with a neglected stubble or a beard, talking reflectively with a cigarette in his hand became a trendy pose in those days,’ Mahboobullah chuckled. ‘Women loved it!’

Karamat Hamid a former student at the Dow Medical College in Karachi in the 1970s, says that by 1976 almost all leading Pakistani TV actors had beards. ‘Talat Hussain, Rahat Kazmi, Shafi Muhammad… the creative big shots had beards. It became a global fashion. Cricketers like Dennis Lillie, Wasim Raja, Ian Chappel, rock musicians, Hollywood actors and directors, painters, college boys and even university professors all over the world had beards,’ remembers Karamat. ‘It was a fashion expressing creativity, intellect and manhood.’
 
So exactly when did beards stopped being a liberal/leftist aesthetic and start becoming a ‘religious symbol’?

‘I believe the trend started in the 1980s,’ says Sharib, a former member of the Islami Jamiat Taleba (who later joined the MQM).

‘I remember a lot of us were very impressed by the looks of the Afghan mujahideen. Then we started to keep beards like them,’ he explained.

In other words, one can say that the ideological symbolism of the beard had started to grow from left to the right. Fatigued by the exhaustive liberalism of the preceding decades and now under the propagandist hammer of a reactionary dictatorship, a lot of Pakistanis started rediscovering God, as it were, in the 1980s.

‘Beards started emerging on the most unlikely of men,’ laughs Talha Naqvi, a middle-aged head of an NGO. ‘It became a symbol of piety. Everyone from mujahids to smugglers to traders grew a beard,’ he said.

But according to Talha the real beard explosion happened in the 1990s: ‘This was the time when we first started hearing about people going around and asking young men to grow beards because it was an Islamic tradition. I used to say, if this was a tradition then so was riding a camel or using a brick for a pillow by early converts, so why not follow those examples as well?’

Talha says that the rising number of Pakistani men having beards for religious reasons became even more ubiquitous after the tragic 9/11 episode. ‘More and more young men today keep a beard as an Islamic edict.’

It seems after all these years of searching for some kind of identity, many young Pakistanis have ended up finding one with the help of a beard (or hijab). It’s become an exhibition of instant piety, and more so, a somewhat long-winded belief system that with their purposeful new looks they belong to a special community of chosen people; a herd-like expression of some divinely cohesive uniformity – at least in looks, which in turn may only have little to do with religion. It’s a statement very much opposed to the notion of diversity.



8 Responses to “Beards: a trim history”  

  1. 1 Uzer

    So you’ve basically lumped everyone who has a beard (or Hijab), and is a Muslim into a grand community of arrogant, insecure, faux-pious exhibitionists? That along with those ridiculously ignorant comments by Talha Naqvi simply careens this piece into fairly significant bias. What is your basis for this assertion that people use beards to identify with a “herd” of non-individuals in need of “divinely cohesive uniformity”? Is your final conclusion based around the statement of a middle aged NGO head independently claiming that more young men today keep beards to follow Islamic edicts? What’s his data? And how did you extrapolate that to include Hijab as well? Assuming that your assertions are correct in terms of increased religious leanings of our young, how does that diminish diversity any more than the clean shaven faces of a Westerner influenced? In the 90s I distinctly remember Egyptians fearing to go home with a beard on their face lest they be molested by the security forces there (anecdotal of course).

    Anyway, the lead-up was phenomenal. I thoroughly enjoyed the historical perspective on facial hair.

  2. 2 Ahsan Nisar

    Thanks to NFP for enlightening us on the history of beards from 1950s till date. In his article he has tried to paint all the people having beard with the same brush. After reading the article, I felt that there are certain confusions in the mind of the people regarding the beard which I would like to clarify. Firstly, the only place where the word “beard” has been used in Quran is when Hazrat Musa (Moses) held his brother, Hazrat Harun accountable by holding his beard. The Ulemah quote this verse with reference to the length of the beard.

    Secondly, the word “Sunnah” is often associated with the Holy Prophet (PBUH), however, if one reads Quran, the word “Sunnah” has been attributed to Allah whereas the word “Sabeel” (way, path) has been associated with the Holy Prophet (PBUH). So, I would like to differ with those who say that growing beard was one of the “Sunnahs” of our Holy Prophet (PBUH) as every prophet had grown beard. The real “Sunnah” of our Holy Prophet (PBUH) was “Jehad” (waging war in the way of Allah) & “Tableegh” (propagating Islamic teachings through whatever resources you have) which he had done during the last 23 years of his life. Unfortunately, today many people consider growing beard, doing meswak, keeping clothing above one’s ankles (males only) & wearing turban / cap as the only Sunnah of the Holy Prophet (PBUH).

    Thirdly, change is the only unchanging need that a man possesses. Growth of facial hair on men’s face is a natural phenomenon which is inevitable. Even one can see NFP’s thick stubble in the picture displayed on top of his article. My point is that if one’s identity becomes his/her label, then he/she should not feel ashamed of wearing it.

  3. 3 Reluctant Fundamentalist

    What else could one expect from the boot licking supporter of Musharraf who once condemned those who wear beards. NFP is a cultural critic and should remain one but the problem arises when he starts expressing his opinion on certain sensitive religious matters on which he is no authority.

    The problem with NFP is that he tries to analyze culture critically but draws illogical conclusions. Beard has nothing to do with fundamentalism / extremism. If this is the case, then I wonder what NFP would say about Jewish rabbis whose length of beard is known to everybody. Even in the days of our Holy Prophet (PBUH), Abu Jah’l had beard but he did not embrace Islam. There are countless examples where actions of a person having beard are not in conformance with the Islamic teachings, that’s why it has been said “Islam main darhi (beard) hai, darhi (beard) main Islam nahi”. So, I would request NFP in particular and DAWN in general to stop propagating stereotypical Muslim image as it is leading to gross misinformation about Muslims locally and abroad.

    (Published in Dawn Images feedback section on 18.10.2009)

  4. 4 Titto

    Aha!! Here come the Beard Brigade. Hold on to those chin hairs of yours, dear ones. Big bad NFP’s on the march.
    Viva la Paracha!

  5. 5 Uzer

    Ya let’s all shut up in the face of unsubstantiated claims. All hail the mighty blogger who writes well.

    “The Beard Brigade”. Wow. Your biases are very subtle. How long did it take you to come up with that anyway?

  6. PLEASE NOTE: The visitors who identify themselves as “Ahsan Nisar” & “Reluctant Fundamentalist” are one and the same person.

  7. 7 Peenu

    I wonder how is this article being seen as a manifesto against beards? It’s a wonderful little history of the culture of beards in Pakistan. NFP is known for doing such stuff. Like the one he did on the history of “Allah Hafiz”, etc.
    It’s strange to always come across some people who just go into irrational convulsions after reading an NFP piece.

  8. 8 Uzer

    The beef is not with the majority of the article. If you read the comments you would have read, “Anyway, the lead-up was phenomenal. I thoroughly enjoyed the historical perspective on facial hair”, in between my irrational convulsions, Peenu. To me it read like something out of FOX News or a British tabloid which is unusual for the NFP.

    I was just a bit concerned with the conclusions he drew at the end which I thought were, in my opinion (and it will never be anything more than that), opinions and anecdotes masquerading as facts. I tried to call him out for it because I thought it was important to not belittle people’s beliefs and institutions baselessly. All of this was intended to foster some constructive discussion which really has not come about. And that’s fine. Nobody’s mind ever changes when these types of issues are involved but it’s the ideal that we aim for. Part of it might be the evident lack of respect for a different opinion.

    Try to understand people before judging them irrational, but hey what do I know: I’m just one of The Many (TM).


Leave a Reply